| Market | Category | Side | Market % | AI % | Edge | Vol 24h | Risk | Confidence | Days left | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Top outcome: Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5
|
Sports | Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% | — | — | $1.5M | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5
|
Sports | NOT Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% | — | — | $1.5M | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Match Winner
|
Sports | Match Winner | 79.5% | — | — | $1.4M | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Match Winner
|
Sports | NOT Match Winner | 20.5% | — | — | $1.4M | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: China Open: Novak Djokovic vs Alex de Minaur Set Handicap +/-1.5
|
Sports | China Open: Novak Djokovic vs Alex de Minaur Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 50.5% | — | — | $1.3M | — | — | 2d | |
|
Top outcome: China Open: Novak Djokovic vs Alex de Minaur Set Handicap +/-1.5
|
Sports | NOT China Open: Novak Djokovic vs Alex de Minaur Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 49.5% | — | — | $1.3M | — | — | 2d | |
|
Top outcome: Antofagasta: Joao Lucas Da Silva vs Guido Justo Set 2 Winner
|
Sports | Antofagasta: Joao Lucas Da Silva vs Guido Justo Set 2 Winner | 50.5% | — | — | $654.7K | — | — | 4d | |
|
Top outcome: Antofagasta: Joao Lucas Da Silva vs Guido Justo Set 2 Winner
|
Sports | NOT Antofagasta: Joao Lucas Da Silva vs Guido Justo Set 2 Winner | 49.5% | — | — | $654.7K | — | — | 4d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Adrian Mannarino vs Nikoloz Basilashvili Set 2 O/U 10.5
|
Sports | Shanghai Rolex Masters: Adrian Mannarino vs Nikoloz Basilashvili Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 70.5% | — | — | $628.2K | — | — | 3d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Adrian Mannarino vs Nikoloz Basilashvili Set 2 O/U 10.5
|
Sports | NOT Shanghai Rolex Masters: Adrian Mannarino vs Nikoloz Basilashvili Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 29.5% | — | — | $628.2K | — | — | 3d | |
|
Top outcome: China Open: Alex de Minaur vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 23.5
|
Sports | China Open: Alex de Minaur vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 23.5 | 52% | — | — | $554.9K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: China Open: Alex de Minaur vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 23.5
|
Sports | NOT China Open: Alex de Minaur vs Hubert Hurkacz Match O/U 23.5 | 48% | — | — | $554.9K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Adana: Leolia Jeanjean vs Lois Boisson Game Spread +/-3.5
|
Sports | Adana: Leolia Jeanjean vs Lois Boisson Game Spread +/-3.5 | 24.5% | — | — | $478.2K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Adana: Leolia Jeanjean vs Lois Boisson Game Spread +/-3.5
|
Sports | NOT Adana: Leolia Jeanjean vs Lois Boisson Game Spread +/-3.5 | 75.5% | — | — | $478.2K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: 340-359
|
Entertainment | 340-359 | 28.2% | — | — | $473.8K | — | — | 3d | |
|
Top outcome: 340-359
|
Entertainment | NOT 340-359 | 71.9% | — | — | $473.8K | — | — | 3d | |
|
Top outcome: Adana: Antonia Ruzic vs Leolia Jeanjean Total Sets: O/U 2.5
|
Sports | Adana: Antonia Ruzic vs Leolia Jeanjean Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 53% | — | — | $435.4K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Adana: Antonia Ruzic vs Leolia Jeanjean Total Sets: O/U 2.5
|
Sports | NOT Adana: Antonia Ruzic vs Leolia Jeanjean Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 47% | — | — | $435.4K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Curitiba: Guido Justo vs Tomas Barrios Total Sets: O/U 2.5
|
Sports | Curitiba: Guido Justo vs Tomas Barrios Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 52.5% | — | — | $422.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Curitiba: Guido Justo vs Tomas Barrios Total Sets: O/U 2.5
|
Sports | NOT Curitiba: Guido Justo vs Tomas Barrios Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 47.5% | — | — | $422.6K | — | — | 0d | |
| Sports | Yes | 56% | — | — | $400.2K | — | — | 3d | ||
| Sports | No | 44% | — | — | $400.2K | — | — | 3d | ||
|
Top outcome: Chelsea FC
|
Sports | Chelsea FC | 53.5% | — | — | $345.7K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Chelsea FC
|
Sports | NOT Chelsea FC | 46.5% | — | — | $345.7K | — | — | 0d | |
| Sports | Yes | 50% | — | — | $342.5K | — | — | 0d | ||
| Sports | No | 50% | — | — | $342.5K | — | — | 0d | ||
|
Top outcome: Completed Match
|
Sports | Completed Match | 54% | — | — | $323.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Completed Match
|
Sports | NOT Completed Match | 46% | — | — | $323.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Curitiba: Gustavo Heide vs Guido Justo Set Handicap +/-1.5
|
Sports | Curitiba: Gustavo Heide vs Guido Justo Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 15% | — | — | $308.8K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Curitiba: Gustavo Heide vs Guido Justo Set Handicap +/-1.5
|
Sports | NOT Curitiba: Gustavo Heide vs Guido Justo Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 85% | — | — | $308.8K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Vitality (-3.5) vs Aurora Gaming (+3.5)
|
Sports | Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Vitality (-3.5) vs Aurora Gaming (+3.5) | 53.5% | — | — | $302.5K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Vitality (-3.5) vs Aurora Gaming (+3.5)
|
Sports | NOT Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Vitality (-3.5) vs Aurora Gaming (+3.5) | 46.5% | — | — | $302.5K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: ↓ 84,000
|
Crypto | ↓ 84,000 | 84.5% | — | — | $298.0K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: ↓ 84,000
|
Crypto | NOT ↓ 84,000 | 15.5% | — | — | $298.0K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Chun-Hsin Tseng vs Nicolas Mejia Set 2 O/U 10.5
|
Sports | Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Chun-Hsin Tseng vs Nicolas Mejia Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 70.5% | — | — | $251.6K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Chun-Hsin Tseng vs Nicolas Mejia Set 2 O/U 10.5
|
Sports | NOT Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Chun-Hsin Tseng vs Nicolas Mejia Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 29.5% | — | — | $251.6K | — | — | 1d | |
| Sports | Yes | 50.5% | — | — | $229.7K | — | — | 6d | ||
| Sports | No | 49.5% | — | — | $229.7K | — | — | 6d | ||
|
Top outcome: ↓ 2,500
|
Crypto | ↓ 2,500 | 67% | — | — | $229.6K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: ↓ 2,500
|
Crypto | NOT ↓ 2,500 | 33% | — | — | $229.6K | — | — | 1d | |
| Sports | Yes | 77.5% | — | — | $221.3K | — | — | 6d | ||
| Sports | No | 22.5% | — | — | $221.3K | — | — | 6d | ||
| Sports | Yes | 50.5% | — | — | $194.4K | — | — | 2d | ||
| Sports | No | 49.5% | — | — | $194.4K | — | — | 2d | ||
|
Top outcome: Match Winner
|
Sports | Match Winner | 73% | — | — | $189.8K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Match Winner
|
Sports | NOT Match Winner | 27% | — | — | $189.8K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: FC Bayern München 1st Half O/U 0.5
|
Sports | FC Bayern München 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 78% | — | — | $175.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: FC Bayern München 1st Half O/U 0.5
|
Sports | NOT FC Bayern München 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 22% | — | — | $175.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Anna Bondar vs Lois Boisson Set 2 O/U 10.5
|
Sports | Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Anna Bondar vs Lois Boisson Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 74.5% | — | — | $173.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Anna Bondar vs Lois Boisson Set 2 O/U 10.5
|
Sports | NOT Wuhan Tennis Open, Qualification: Anna Bondar vs Lois Boisson Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 25.5% | — | — | $173.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Match Winner
|
Sports | Match Winner | 53.5% | — | — | $162.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Match Winner
|
Sports | NOT Match Winner | 46.5% | — | — | $162.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Chargers O/U 12.5
|
Sports | Chargers O/U 12.5 | 85% | — | — | $158.9K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Chargers O/U 12.5
|
Sports | NOT Chargers O/U 12.5 | 15% | — | — | $158.9K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Athletic Club
|
Sports | Athletic Club | 37.5% | — | — | $158.0K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Athletic Club
|
Sports | NOT Athletic Club | 62.5% | — | — | $158.0K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Brighton & Hove Albion FC
|
Sports | Brighton & Hove Albion FC | 41.5% | — | — | $155.0K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Brighton & Hove Albion FC
|
Sports | NOT Brighton & Hove Albion FC | 58.5% | — | — | $155.0K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 26.5
|
Sports | O/U 26.5 | 85% | — | — | $154.1K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 26.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 26.5 | 15% | — | — | $154.1K | — | — | 1d | |
| Sports | Yes | 21% | — | — | $134.7K | — | — | 1d | ||
| Sports | No | 79.1% | — | — | $134.7K | — | — | 1d | ||
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Luciano Darderi vs Stefanos Tsitsipas Set Handicap +/-1.5
|
Sports | Shanghai Rolex Masters: Luciano Darderi vs Stefanos Tsitsipas Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 66.5% | — | — | $132.3K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Luciano Darderi vs Stefanos Tsitsipas Set Handicap +/-1.5
|
Sports | NOT Shanghai Rolex Masters: Luciano Darderi vs Stefanos Tsitsipas Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 33.5% | — | — | $132.3K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Villena: Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Pedro Martinez Match O/U 21.5
|
Sports | Villena: Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Pedro Martinez Match O/U 21.5 | 50% | — | — | $126.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Villena: Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Pedro Martinez Match O/U 21.5
|
Sports | NOT Villena: Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Pedro Martinez Match O/U 21.5 | 50% | — | — | $126.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Yoshihito Nishioka vs Dalibor Svrcina Total Sets: O/U 2.5
|
Sports | Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Yoshihito Nishioka vs Dalibor Svrcina Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 70% | — | — | $112.0K | — | — | 2d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Yoshihito Nishioka vs Dalibor Svrcina Total Sets: O/U 2.5
|
Sports | NOT Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Yoshihito Nishioka vs Dalibor Svrcina Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 30% | — | — | $112.0K | — | — | 2d | |
|
Top outcome: Patriots O/U 12.5
|
Sports | Patriots O/U 12.5 | 85% | — | — | $110.6K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Patriots O/U 12.5
|
Sports | NOT Patriots O/U 12.5 | 15% | — | — | $110.6K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 26.5
|
Sports | O/U 26.5 | 85% | — | — | $109.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 26.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 26.5 | 15% | — | — | $109.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 35.5
|
Sports | O/U 35.5 | 76% | — | — | $103.0K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 35.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 35.5 | 24% | — | — | $103.0K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 28.5
|
Sports | O/U 28.5 | 83.5% | — | — | $102.6K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 28.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 28.5 | 16.5% | — | — | $102.6K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: 2Q O/U 5.5
|
Sports | 2Q O/U 5.5 | 85% | — | — | $98.9K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: 2Q O/U 5.5
|
Sports | NOT 2Q O/U 5.5 | 15% | — | — | $98.9K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 4.5 Games
|
Sports | O/U 4.5 Games | 75.5% | — | — | $93.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 4.5 Games
|
Sports | NOT O/U 4.5 Games | 24.5% | — | — | $93.2K | — | — | 0d | |
| Sports | Yes | 68.5% | — | — | $88.3K | — | — | 6d | ||
| Sports | No | 31.5% | — | — | $88.3K | — | — | 6d | ||
|
Top outcome: Seahawks O/U 19.5
|
Sports | Seahawks O/U 19.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $83.2K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Seahawks O/U 19.5
|
Sports | NOT Seahawks O/U 19.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $83.2K | — | — | 1d | |
| Sports | Yes | 50.5% | — | — | $82.7K | — | — | 1d | ||
| Sports | No | 49.5% | — | — | $82.7K | — | — | 1d | ||
|
Top outcome: O/U 42.5
|
Sports | O/U 42.5 | 80.5% | — | — | $76.9K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 42.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 42.5 | 19.5% | — | — | $76.9K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 37.5
|
Sports | O/U 37.5 | 83% | — | — | $74.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 37.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 37.5 | 17% | — | — | $74.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Manchester United FC
|
Sports | Manchester United FC | 57.5% | — | — | $74.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Manchester United FC
|
Sports | NOT Manchester United FC | 42.5% | — | — | $74.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Spread -1.5
|
Sports | Spread -1.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $71.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Spread -1.5
|
Sports | NOT Spread -1.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $71.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 35.5
|
Sports | O/U 35.5 | 82% | — | — | $71.3K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 35.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 35.5 | 18% | — | — | $71.3K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: 1st Half O/U 0.5
|
Sports | 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $67.5K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: 1st Half O/U 0.5
|
Sports | NOT 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $67.5K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Lance Stroll
|
Sports | Lance Stroll | 43.1% | — | — | $65.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Lance Stroll
|
Sports | NOT Lance Stroll | 57% | — | — | $65.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Real Madrid CF
|
Sports | Real Madrid CF | 71.5% | — | — | $65.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Real Madrid CF
|
Sports | NOT Real Madrid CF | 28.5% | — | — | $65.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Botic van de Zandschulp vs Alex Michelsen Set 1 O/U 8.5
|
Sports | Shanghai Rolex Masters: Botic van de Zandschulp vs Alex Michelsen Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 81% | — | — | $64.1K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Botic van de Zandschulp vs Alex Michelsen Set 1 O/U 8.5
|
Sports | NOT Shanghai Rolex Masters: Botic van de Zandschulp vs Alex Michelsen Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 19% | — | — | $64.1K | — | — | 6d | |
| Sports | Yes | 50.5% | — | — | $64.1K | — | — | 2d | ||
| Sports | No | 49.5% | — | — | $64.1K | — | — | 2d | ||
|
Top outcome: ↑ 83,000
|
Crypto | ↑ 83,000 | 74% | — | — | $64.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: ↑ 83,000
|
Crypto | NOT ↑ 83,000 | 26% | — | — | $64.1K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 30.5
|
Sports | O/U 30.5 | 83% | — | — | $62.5K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 30.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 30.5 | 17% | — | — | $62.5K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Sebastian Baez vs Valentin Vacherot Set 1 O/U 8.5
|
Sports | Shanghai Rolex Masters: Sebastian Baez vs Valentin Vacherot Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 78% | — | — | $59.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: Shanghai Rolex Masters: Sebastian Baez vs Valentin Vacherot Set 1 O/U 8.5
|
Sports | NOT Shanghai Rolex Masters: Sebastian Baez vs Valentin Vacherot Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 22% | — | — | $59.7K | — | — | 6d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 35.5
|
Sports | O/U 35.5 | 79.5% | — | — | $59.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 35.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 35.5 | 20.5% | — | — | $59.6K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Manchester City FC
|
Sports | Manchester City FC | 42.5% | — | — | $59.4K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Manchester City FC
|
Sports | NOT Manchester City FC | 57.5% | — | — | $59.4K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: 3Q O/U 5.5
|
Sports | 3Q O/U 5.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $58.7K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: 3Q O/U 5.5
|
Sports | NOT 3Q O/U 5.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $58.7K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 39.5
|
Sports | O/U 39.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $58.4K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 39.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 39.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $58.4K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: 2,500
|
Crypto | 2,500 | 37.4% | — | — | $51.7K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: 2,500
|
Crypto | NOT 2,500 | 62.7% | — | — | $51.7K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Falcons O/U 12.5
|
Sports | Falcons O/U 12.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $50.3K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: Falcons O/U 12.5
|
Sports | NOT Falcons O/U 12.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $50.3K | — | — | 1d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 37.5
|
Sports | O/U 37.5 | 80.5% | — | — | $50.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: O/U 37.5
|
Sports | NOT O/U 37.5 | 19.5% | — | — | $50.2K | — | — | 0d | |
|
Top outcome: Bills O/U 19.5
|
Sports | Bills O/U 19.5 | 84.5% | — | — | $41.1K | — | — | 2d | |
|
Top outcome: Bills O/U 19.5
|
Sports | NOT Bills O/U 19.5 | 15.5% | — | — | $41.1K | — | — | 2d |